What would you do with these vegetables?

You remember the 1970s, don’t you?

That blissful time of communes and collectives and peaceniks, of lentil nut loaf and bland steamed vegetables and birdseed-like undercooked millet and flavorless “health bread” so dense that it could be used as ballast on the Queen Mary. Then came the books: Laurel’s Kitchen (who was Laurel, and where is she now?), and Mollie Katzen’s ground-breaking bestseller The Moosewood Cookbook, that had vegetarians and wannabes cooking up things like zuccanoes and hummus using extraordinary, carotid artery-exploding quantities of fats and dairy.

In the late 1970s and early 80s, rumors flew around the New York restaurant community about Greens in San Francisco, where founding chef Deborah Madison elevated vegetarian cuisine to an entirely new, utterly remarkable level. All the while, I, a student at Boston University, was relegated to eating things like sprout-and-mashed-tofu-heavy East West Lasagna, and “chik’n surprise” every night in the vegetarian dining room, where they served 200 pale, thin kids instead of the 1,200 hamburger-munching carnivores who mobbed the general university cafeterias for dinner.

Twenty years after I graduated, we were all starting to talk about organics; then came the local food movement in the 2000s, and Alice Waters, followed by the battle cry for healthier meals in schools. After them came the crowd that said eating vegetarian wasn’t enough—not enough for us, not enough for the planet, and not enough for the egg chickens and the dairy cows (who, even stamped with the organic label, would still have, respectively, their beaks removed and their male calves sold for veal). Then came veganism, the cause being led by everyone from the hipster contingent among us, to Mark Bittman, to Jonathan Safran Foer. And it’s only now that some Americans are taking on Bittman’s burden of vegan-till-dusk, a lifestyle that supposedly allows one to eat whatever the hell one wants once the sun goes down, and still feel pretty good about it. And now, we’ve got Oprah and her staff of 378 to thank for pushing veganism beyond the parameters of the NY Times-reading, NPR-listening crowd (of which I am a card-carrying member): challenged to be vegans for a week, 300 of the original 378 Oprah staffers who signed up for the program finished it, losing a remarkable total of 444 pounds in the process. And what did they eat? A diet of processed, faux-meat products shaped and formed to act, look, taste like, and ultimately, replace meat. As one blogger said, where exactly were the vegetables? Where were the grains? If you look at the USDA food pyramid, is there a slot for Kraft-owned Boca Burgers, or soy cheese that melts just like Kraft American singles?

We want Americans to eat less meat and more vegetables and grains,  so what do we do? We riff on Jessica Seinfeld’s Deceptively Delicious, and infantilize them; we feed them what they’re used to: hamburgers and hotdogs made from compressed wheat meat or GMO-laden, soy-based tofu, and tell them “no really, it’ll taste the same. You won’t even know the difference.”

Why not insist that those taking part in this experiment eat the very things that define vegetarianism—vegetables—instead of more processed junk? It’s not  because there’s some evil, veggie-burger-making mega-corporation behind the project (although the GMO soybeans  processed to make some of the “food” may be produced by one). It’s because most of us don’t know what to do with vegetables to make them interesting, crave-worthy, and delicious. And those of us who implore Americans to start eating more vegetables forget this point: collectively, we’re vegetable idiots. And until we learn, we’ll be gobbling down more processed, meatfree junk in the name of health and the earth rather than eating the fresh stuff that must be prepared and cooked.

Vegetables are simply not a part of the American culinary lexicon: give a man a kohlrabi and he won’t know what to do with it. Give a man a steak, and he will. In this nation, built on the backs of the cattle industry, vegetables have almost always been relegated to a secondary or tertiary spot on the dinner plate, assuming they’ve shown up at all. Brussels sprouts and peas — canned, frozen, and cooked until gray and lifeless — were, if you were faced with them as a child, for throwing, or for burying under cold mashed potatoes. Carrots—cut into rounds and overcooked—were bland and flaccid and palate-anesthetizing. Bad things would happen to you, digestively speaking, if you ate undercooked cauliflower, and let’s not even go near cabbage, even after your mother boiled it for three hours.  And the aforementioned kohlrabi? Forget it.

Compare this to the role of vegetables on the Asian or Mediterranean plate: you can eat Asian food — Malaysian, Indian, Vietnamese, Thai, Chinese — morning, noon, and night, and never once eat a meat protein and never once miss it because the food (not labeled vegetarian or vegan or gluten-free; it just is what it is) combines a wallop of flavor with texture and often, heartiness. It’s easy to be a vegetarian or a vegan in Asia because it’s a commonplace existence rather than a personal label linked to politics, or health, or both. It’s meat that’s a rarity, and soy-based meat-like substances don’t exist at all. By comparison, what would the American vegetarian lexicon look like if we were to describe it? Frozen patties meant to simulate meat—the very thing we’re wanting to eat less of, or eliminate completely.

So how to truly effect a major change in this multi-lingual nation of ours, and to get people from the youngest of ages to start speaking vegetable vernacular like a language (even if they aren’t destined to become vegetarians or vegans)? Start at the grade school level. Forget home economics and the in-school cooking classes that are starting to mercifully crop up all over the country. Instead, make botanical education a part of the earth science curriculum that virtually every American kid has to sit through in 8th grade and pass; then link that botanical education to the hands-on, practical act of cooking. Make them required classes so that not one graduating American kid leaves school without the basic knowledge of what a stalk of broccoli is, where it came from, and what to do with it.

It’s been a long time since I ate lentil nut loaf, that tannish, doorstop-weight amalgam of legumes glued together with a dozen eggs  and meant to fool my hopeful palate into believing that it was really tasting my grandmother’s meatloaf. In my home, those days are gone, forever replaced by market bags filled with the colorful, robustly-flavored vegetables that we eat every night.

Our grocery bill has shrunk substantially, as have our waists.

Old Spoon Love

February 11, 2011 · 13 comments

Liberated spoons.

Many months ago, when Susan’s beloved Aunt Millie died at the age of 95, we had the unenviable task of helping to clean out the home she shared with her husband for more than fifty years. An admitted pack rat, Aunt Millie kept everything: Mass cards from 1931; weird paintings of weird things that somehow appealed to her or to Uncle George and wound up in living in the basement; a child’s chair made in the 1700s (Aunt Millie was childless); dozens of non-functioning cameras; crates of wire-topped Ball canning jars from the 1940s all missing their gaskets.

We adored Aunt Millie; she was a kind and gentle soul who endured the ravages of old age peacefully and with good humor, and when the subject of the inevitable came up, she’d often say “well, I’ll get to see my George again. So it’s okay.” Devoutly religious (we used to say she had a direct line to God), she loved animals so much that the local raccoons used to climb up her back steps for the Oreo cookies she’d feed them by hand. Susan and I were standing in her kitchen one afternoon when the house was nearly empty; there was nothing left in the cabinets except for some cleaning products from the Eisenhower administration. On the counter stood a pitcher with a half dozen or so ancient, sticky, grotty, well-used wooden spoons. They were nasty in the way that things start to get when eyesight goes bad and one just no longer notices the ickiness. It happens to everyone, eventually.

“Is your mother taking them-?” I asked Susan.

“No—what would she do with extra spoons?”

“I think we should take them, if no one else wants them,” I said.

No one did. Because who would want six ancient, sticky, grotty, well-used spoons when they could just go to Sur La Table or even the local supermarket and buy fresh, new ones? I would.

So I brought them home and first ran them through the dishwasher; then I soaked them in a basin filled with a cleaning solution for a few hours. I ran them through the dishwasher again. And then I started to use them.

I’m not sure what it is about old wooden spoons, but every time I look at these—much in the same way that I look at ancient, antique-shop fountain pens—I imagine the hands that held them, and the dishes that were stirred with them. One of the ones we inherited from Aunt Mill looks like a sort of rice/canoe paddle; another is a tasting spoon that looks like it might have come with a set of Dansk pots from the late 40s or early 1950s; another is small and very, very old and primitive, and that’s my favorite.

Over the years, I’ve become an ardent fan of old, manual things; I did go through a disturbing modernist phase a few years ago when it was all the rage, though, and I began to acquire stuff that was oddly compelling but also unnervingly shiny and new: a cheese grater whose plastic handle was fashioned into the shape of a penguin’s head; a plastic spork—spoon on one side, fork on the other—that snapped in half when I tried to use it to scoop a bit of ice cream directly from the pint container; a red, plastic Y-shaped peeler with a fancy ceramic blade that never seems to swivel in the right direction; an orange plastic waiter’s corkscrew that automatically adjusts its angle as you pull the cork out of the bottle. It broke two months ago, the screw disintegrating into a small pile of metal dust in my hands. I attribute this to buying all of these things while mercury was in retrograde, a time during which you should apparently never sign any contracts, or buy anything even remotely mechanical. Old wooden spoons are just a lot safer that way; they seem to have a half life.

And I guess that’s what I love about old stuff; it always seems to last. If it didn’t, it wouldn’t be old. Of course, there are exceptions, like Susan’s ancient Revereware saucepan that we gave to my mother when she’d burned her last pot by filling it with water, putting it on the stove, and taking a nap. She called recently to ask if it was okay to still use the Revereware even though the copper was coming through the bottom.

“How did that happen?” I asked. “It was forty years old and in perfect condition—”

“Oh,” she said, “it must have been defective.”

And this is her answer for everything, because she does tend to be a little ham-fisted with the stuff she owns: she breaks it, and has to buy it all over again. And again. My mother could have an entire landfill dedicated just to the stuff she’s owned, broken, thrown away, and replaced. Rinse, repeat. The only thing in her house that has ever had much staying power is her turkey meatloaf.

But it’s not just things that can be categorized into old and modern; food can, too, and when I went on that modernist binge a few years ago, my sudden attraction towards the shiny and new started to show up at my dinner table: I stuffed the ingredients for very traditional salmon and lentils into a timbale mold, and served it, vertical, on an otherwise unadorned porcelain charger while Susan, just home from work, wanted little more than a bowl of cereal. I bought stark white, rectangular plates and served pork belly with spicy collards and celeraic remoulade as a kind of overwrought tryptich: one perfect square of glazed pork belly to the left, a hockey puck-shaped portion of spicy collards (shaped in a muffin ring) in the middle, and the remoulade (muffin ring, again) on the right. After I stopped cooing at my creation, I realized how ridiculous it was.

“Can we have roast chicken tomorrow night,” Susan asked. Sometimes, new and clean and trendy just doesn’t cut it.

Surrounding myself with old things—my father’s leather three-ring binder from the early 1930s, my uncle’s Remington Noiseless Model Seven that he got when he graduated from high school a few years before World War II started, my grandmother’s pearls, my late father-in-law’s desk (on which I’m writing this), my Stauffer circa 1885 parlor guitar, Aunt Millie’s spoons and her wire-topped 1940s Ball jars (now filled with grains and Steve Sando’s beans, and living on a shelf in my kitchen)—seems to me to be a combination of sheer Luddite indulgence and a desire to keep the past alive. It’s probably a little bit of both. Living in this world of digitalia as I do, where stuff is here and gone in a nanosecond, it’s no wonder that I’d want to cling to the things that stay, like the sticking “E” key on my uncle’s Remington, and that weird rice paddle-shaped thing that we liberated from Aunt Millie’s kitchen, right before the house went up for sale.

indiebound

 

©2009, ©2010, Poor Man's Feast. All rights reserved. To reprint any content herein, including recipes and photography, please contact rights@poormansfeast.com