The Brown Food of Woodstock

August 16, 2009

Remember that scene in Annie Hall when Alvie says to Allison Porchnick that she’s 

“New York Jewish, left-wing, liberal, intellectual, Central Park West, Brandeis University, socialist summer camps, father with the Ben Shahn drawings…”

and she replies that she loves being reduced to a cultural stereotype? 

Well, forgive me, in advance. 

I don’t know about you, but something very peculiar happens to me when I’m around vegetarians and macrobiotics and people who actually know off the top of their heads the correct proportion of water-to-amaranth so that the latter doesn’t come out with the consistency of a textured brick: when I’m around these people, I suddenly become virtuous. 

I start talking about buying those vegan Birkenstocks instead of that new pair of tan suede Bostons I’ve been needing for the last twelve years. I start buying makeup at the health food store. I start replacing the $18 a pound artisanal pork sausage I love with stuff that includes ingredients like Textured Vegetable Protein, and tempeh. I try to convince Susan that pan-seared seitan really does taste the same as Wiener Schnitzel. 

It’s almost like Luchow’s. 
Really.

This happens to me at least once a year and this time around, it was particularly bad. $137.23 bad, and I can only blame it on seeing Wavy Gravy (nee Hugh Romney, possible relation to Mitt if only for his organizational skills) on television last night, recalling how  he and his Hog Farmers schlepped thousands of pounds of “macrobiotic rice” to the Woodstock Festival in 1969, exactly forty years ago this past weekend. 
Well, that explains my shopping bill. 
I’m not sure whether the festival actually gave birth to the Brown Food Movement in Woodstock, or if it existed in upstate New York (in Bethel, site of the concert, or in Woodstock proper, about an hour away) long before Michael Lang–he of the fabulous hair and leather vest–envisioned the three day bacchanal. I do know that Ithaca’s Molly Katzen didn’t publish her Moosewood Cookbook until 1977. Edward Espe Brown’s Tassajara Bread Book came out in 1970, but he’s a Zen monk from California and therefore was probably quite early to the party. But either way, I’ve had a very long relationship with Woodstock and the odd thing that happens to me, culinarily-speaking, whenever I get near either it (it being the village of Woodstock) or any mention of It (meaning the concert, which, at six years old I was far too young to attend and which my older cousins studiously avoided. We don’t do mud in my family): I have a sudden desire to cook Brown Food in massive amounts.
Even as a small child, Woodstock held a very special place in my life. The short version: sometime in the 1940s or thereabouts (the story has been told to me about a million different ways, depending on which way the wind is blowing), my Uncle Marvin’s father, Harry–an anarchist/architect who had managed to escape from Russia with the Czar’s troops chasing him the whole way–bought a chunk of property right on Tannery Brook in Woodstock proper, with the intent to build houses there so he could get the family’s kids out of the city for the summer. This was not just whim; polio had infiltrated the city’s schools and playgrounds, and he wanted his grandkids and nieces and nephews out of danger. But what started as just a practical idea wound up being a virtual Brigadoon: he built 3 houses surrounding a small central compound less than a block away from the brook, less than three blocks away from the center of town. 
In our family, we all have very separate memories of Woodstock. My cousin Nina tells me, with great and precise detail, that she can close her eyes and see her Grandma Lena (Harry’s wife) walking from her house down the path to Nina’s, holding a still-warm, freshly-baked blueberry pie, because she knew how much her granddaughter loved them. There are stories of my cousin Stan’s succulent barbecued chicken, of volleyball games and of teaching the children how to paint; and of how, during the War, Lena and my Aunt Thelma pin-pointed on a gigantic map exactly where my Uncle Marvin was in Europe, based on an agreed-upon set of secret clues he’d sent her in letters, which passed the censors without issue. As a child, I remember little more than feeling remarkably safe there, and being surrounded by very cool people who all really liked each other a lot, which I guess is not too different from how the festival-goers claimed to feel during that muddy weekend in 1969, forty or so miles down the road from my aunt and uncle’s house. My family’s compound in Woodstock was just like the festival, only with pinochle and Allan Sherman.
Years after my family sold the property in the 1970s, my time in Woodstock was limited to visits as a teenager on my days off from a summer job working in Maplecrest, New York, and some years later, visiting with my late friends Peter and Tim, who had a small cottage up the road from town, in Lake Hill. In both instances, I found myself searching for Lena, her outstretched hands holding a warm, freshly-baked blueberry pie, and for Stan’s barbecued chicken. Instead, I was faced with Brown Food. 
Peter and Tim, in the space of a few years, cooked for me all manner of Woodstockian Brown Food: there were pilafs and tarts, breads and pies, soups and “salads”, the latter of which were always devoid of a high note, like a simple vinaigrette, or even a squeeze of lemon. They were just Brown. And murky. And muddy. Much like Wavy Gravy’s recipe for a dish that he would call “breakfast in bed for 400,000”:
A few years later on Thanksgiving, I spent the holiday at Peter and Tim’s house and was given clear directions: we don’t care what you cook, but it has to be vegetarian. They didn’t specify that it had to be brown, but it was strongly suggested to me that I stuff a large pumpkin with a brown lentil stew, which I did. What they neglected to mention (and because I was not a vegetarian I didn’t know) was that unless I bought the correct kind of pumpkin, the stuffed one I had in the oven would explode and ooze brown lentil stew all over their brown 1970s oven, and all over their brown pine floors. Which it did. 
The odd thing about The Brown Food of Woodstock, at least in Peter and Tim’s case, was once they left Woodstock and headed home to the city, their food ceased to be brown. Sometimes, it was green. Sometimes, if tomatoes were involved, it was red. But once they went back to Woodstock, the food they cooked — and they asked me to cook — was invariably brown, including: 
Lentil nut loaf with brown sauce
Steamed brown rice
Brown rice and barley pilaf
Bulgur Pilaf
Kasha Stew
Millet and butternut squash goulash
Brown lentil stew
Baked amaranth pie
Not that there’s anything wrong with these dishes. There isn’t. But there’s far more to vegetarian life than Brown Food: just ask Deborah Madison, Robin Asbell, Lorna Sass, Suvir Saran, Yamuna Devi, and many, many others. Even Susan no longer gasps when I announce that I’m making French lentils for dinner; it took her a while, but she now knows that they don’t always have to be murky. Or brown. 
So, I didn’t buy the vegan Birkenstocks this time, but my pantry is now filled with all manner of Brown Food, with which I will attempt to create dishes that do not remind my partner of the vegetarian food of the late 1960s. Honestly. I just couldn’t help myself. I blame my knee-jerk culinary reaction on the very idea of Woodstock as being like Proust’s madeleine: when I close my eyes and think of Wavy Gravy and what a great organizational guru he really must have been, and having breakfast at the now-defunct Misty’s on the Green, and I remember Peter and Tim, and Grandma Lena and her blueberry pie, I just smile. This dish, which marries the best of their worlds, is dedicated to them. 
Not Exactly Lena’s Whole Wheat Blueberry Pie 
I’m one of those odd people who just never liked pie until I met Susan, who could eat pie morning, noon, and night. This recipe marries fresh, seasonal blueberries to a surprisingly light whole wheat crust that bakes up reasonably flakey and crispy. And brown. 
Serves 6, or Susan
For the crust
1-1/2 cups whole wheat pastry flour
1/2 cup unbleached pastry flour
1/2 teaspoon salt
1 stick cold unsalted butter, in small cubes
1/2 cup cold water
For the filling
1/2 cup granulated sugar
2/3 cup light brown sugar
1/3 cup instant tapioca
6 cups fresh blueberries
2 tablespoons fresh lemon juice
2 tablespoons unsalted butter, in small cubes
1. In the bowl of a food processor, combine the flours with the salt, pulsing rapidly. Add the butter a few cubes at a time, pulsing until the combination looks like rolled oats. Drizzle in the cold water, pulsing rapidly, until the crust comes together in a ball. Remove, divide in half, and roll out one crust at a time on a well-floured surface. Refrigerate between sheets of wax paper, until you’re ready to assemble. When ready, press one crust into the bottom of a pie tin. 
2. Preheat oven to 375 degrees F. Fold together the sugars and tapioca. Toss with the blueberries and lemon juice. Pour into the pie shell, mounding the berries in the center. Dot with butter and cover with the second pie crust. Crimp the edges using the tines of a fork, unless you want to get fancy. Poke the ubiquitous pie holes in the top with the same fork. 
3. Place the pie on a baking sheet, and set it in the oven on a middle rack. Bake for 20 minutes, until the top begins to get brown(er); reduce the heat to 350 degrees F and bake for another 25 minutes, until the filling is bubbling. Cool on a wire rack.


I found myself tooling around Dorie Greenspan‘s blog early this morning, and I came upon a great and very pertinent quote that’s still lingering on my lips: 

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. 
Amidst the hype and the muck surrounding the release of Julie & Julia, and the chatter about whether or not Julia actually didn’t find Julie Powell to be a serious cook (I recant all I’ve said; Russ Parson’s wonderful article about this fact ends all conjecture), the questions about the infamous Julie/Julia roast chicken episode that bubbled to the surface are:
Is it about the fact that the roast chicken was dry and probably didn’t really need to be trussed, which might be a waste of time if you’ve got other things to do, or if you have in hand Sandra Lee’s quick ‘n simple version which the kids seem to love anyway, so what the hell;
or 
 Is it about understanding the concept of why you would quasi-bard a lean bird with butter after tightly trussing it, and then force upon it an environment that replicates the rotational turns of a spit 
so that it cooks evenly? 
Add in the issues of context, and beat, rapidly: 
What kind of chicken did Julia use? 
Well, that depends. It took her approximately eight years of collaborative work to complete Mastering the Art of French Cooking (which, I have to tell you is a long, long time in cookbook–or any book–land, and guaranteed to make you, editor or author, pretty much want to tear your face off), a good part of which was spent in France, where the chickens are not American chickens as we know them. For one thing, they’re a bit smaller, and if you happen to be anywhere near Bresse and testing roast chicken recipes for a year or so, you’re going to wind up with something quite different then the bird that might be contractually provided to you by Safeway Stores for on-air use, when they sponsor your television show a few years later. 
What kind of stove did Julia use?
Well, that depends. It took her approximately eight years of collaborative work to complete Mastering the Art of French Cooking (which, I have to tell you is a long, long time in cookbook–or any book–land, and guaranteed to make you, editor or author, pretty much want to tear your face off), a good part of which was spent in France, where it’s anybody’s guess how hot or cold her stove ran. We do know that Paul installed a Garland in the Cambridge house, and that Garland only makes restaurant stoves; these are not pro-style ranges. They are meant for the professional kitchen. So again, odds are your stove and Julia’s stove are going to be two very different birds, so to speak, depending upon where you live and what year it is. 
But what if it doesn’t matter, at all? 
What if the fact of the dry chicken, or the stove, or the type of bird isn’t the issue, and that instead, it’s all about knowing how (and why) to truss a bird, so that if you decide to cook the stuffing in the turkey next November, you can actually manage to do it while keeping it moist and in the bird at the same time? Or understanding why it was necessary, at that time and in that place and under those certain conditions, to massage a bird with the most flavorful fat available before proceeding with the roasting process, so that if you ever find yourself staring at the (notoriously lean) fowl at the co-op in Arezzo, you’ll know exactly what to do to help it along?
It’s true: a great recipe should produce great results. But indeed, context will never guarantee that what comes out of your oven will be the same thing that came out of Julia’s, nor will it ever guarantee that it will taste the same, or look the same. This is my bone of contention with the Food Network, Top Chef, and most of the cooks on television today, with the exception of Lidia Bastianich and Jacques Pepin: the average home cook, with little time on their hands and even less patience and far less skill, winds up trying to create vertically-plated meals by watching pros and semi-pros (they know who they are) do it in exactly 20 minutes, with a staff of ten, not including food stylists. What’s missing here is the plain and simple Why. Why is it necessary to reserve pasta water to add to the sauce as its cooking? Why is it preferable to roast a chicken on its breast for at least part of its cooking time? Why should butter always be cold when you’re making pie crust? Why should you not crowd the pan when you’re browning the beef? 
And this, I think, is what Julia was all about: the fearless learning, the understanding, the importance of comprehension, and the sense of personal responsibility that would compel her to figure out what went wrong (when it did, and in eight years, it surely did), and to keep at it until she got it right. When she told Russ Parsons that she didn’t think that Julie Powell was a serious cook, and in a fit of professional human pride wondered how she could have problems with the recipes, perhaps she was also wondering why Julie didn’t go back and try to figure out what went wrong along the way. And to take at least part of the responsibility for it. 
When something goes wrong, it’s up to us to go back and figure out what it was that we — yes, we — did or didn’t do to wind up with the result we got; it’s about learning, understanding, and getting our brains around the process. My attempt at Julia’s roast chicken was dry because it roasted too long in a blast furnace; my oven is at least 15 degrees hotter than it should be, and I should have compensated for that, but I didn’t. The skin tore on one of the rotations, probably because I hadn’t sufficiently basted the bird well enough with the oil/butter mixture, the butterfat caramelized in the pan, and the skin stuck. I think.
I read yesterday that Julia’s publisher of record, Alfred Knopf, was going back to press to reprint another 75,000 copies of MAFC. That’s no small beans–not in the publishing world. What does this mean, then, for the cooks among us? It means that mastering the art of the process may be back with a vengeance, and for that fact alone, I think Julia would have been thrilled. 
indiebound

 

©2009, ©2010, Poor Man's Feast. All rights reserved. To reprint any content herein, including recipes and photography, please contact rights@poormansfeast.com