Civility and Food

January 20, 2011 · 7 comments

I remember it like it was yesterday: my grandmother plunked a Meissen platter of her special, matzo meal-dredged fried chicken in front of me and implored me to eat. I did, slicing into a golden, crispy, kosher breast with a dinner knife.

“What the hell are you doing?” she asked, scowling.

“Eating my chicken,” I answered, confused.

Pick it up and eat it. You know, like you mean it!” She grabbed a leg from the platter and tore off the entire thigh portion with her teeth, gnawing and snarfing and chomping vigorously.

This is the way you eat fried chicken,” she mumbled, wiping her face with a napkin before repairing to the bathroom to re-glue her uppers, which she’d always manage to loosen when she ate with her hands.

Months later, at sleepaway camp, my English counselor, Kate Findlay, gawked at me while I tore into a wing.

“What on earth are you doing?” she said, putting her chip butty down on her plastic plate. Kate was allergic to chicken, and was always eating special meals that the camp chef prepared for her.

“Eating–” I started to say.

“Like a bloody cavewoman? Use a fork, for God’s sake. Have you no civility, young lady?”  she cried, glaring at me. Then put she put down her French fry sandwich and wiped the Cool Whip off her chin.

I looked at the semi-masticated chicken on my plate, and I thought about it for a bit while my friends noisily ate around me: at what point is it important to act like you’re an evolved creature who walks upright, and when is it okay to behave like a beast who has just clubbed dinner over the head and dragged it back to the cave?

The question here isn’t really one of culinary style; it’s really a matter of knowing what’s appropriate, and when. For the last fifteen years or so, we’ve been culinarily neck-deep in barbecue bliss, which seems to draw large numbers of men who like to chew on slow-roasted, smoked bones mopped with incendiary hot sauces powerful enough to fire a small nuclear facility, all while making very loud and delightful smacking noises. But we also seem to have traveled, culturally, down a path involving dishes of meat the size of your head, and restaurants that serve not inexpensive meals wrapped up in butcher paper, instead of on a plate. You place your order at a counter, are handed a brown paper package on a cafeteria tray, you take it to a communal table like a starving, drooling, grunting troglodyte, unwrap it, and have at it in a totally libidinous manner next to complete strangers who are doing the exact same thing, just like the earliest members of Genus Homo (and by them I don’t mean clean cut gentlemen who can match pocket square to silk knot cufflinks).

Don’t get me wrong: if you put a slab of smoked meat of any kind in front of me, it’ll be gone in an instant. I can go on ad nauseum about the quality of my local artisanal tofu and how nice and pretty my bright lights chard stems are, but hand me a rack of ribs and I spontaneously turn into Raquel Welch in One Million Years BC, minus the fur bikini.

But sometimes, things change: there’s something very weird that happens when you’re standing in the toilet paper aisle at Target on a Saturday morning, and the CNN crawl on your iPhone informs you that there’s been a shooting at a suburban shopping center. You suddenly stop and look around at the sea of humanity surrounding you, mindlessly pushing shopping carts and loading up—glaze-eyed—on cheap plastic chachkas, designer outfits for dogs, camo snugglies, and stacks of discounted Hungry He-Man frozen food dinners manufactured in the same plant as household bleach. You look around at this stuff—at the miles, and piles, and yards of stuff—artfully arranged under the buzzing, soul-killing din of fluorescent lights and the watchful gaze of a teenage floor manager who hasn’t quite started shaving yet, and who goes home to his parents who may or may not ignore him, may or may not feed him, and who may or may not tell him they love him, and you start thinking a little bit differently about how you live, and maybe even about what, and how you eat. At least that’s what happened to me two Saturdays ago, after I heard that a wildly disturbed young man showed up at a peaceful event in Arizona celebrating democracy, and opened fire.

Susan and I went home that morning, and sat down in the living room with some tea. After we blamed those we thought were the obvious root culprits, we agreed: in a country this big, this ungrounded, this deeply angry, what messages are bound to be sent to those who are in need of the greatest stability? That we don’t care? That they’re alone, and that everyone is in it for themselves? That everyone in this country is so viscerally angst-ridden and furious that it’s just part of who we are as Americans, accepting as normal everything from violent road rage to the schools that feed our children dreck, anger at our neighbors-of-a-different-religion-next door and at the Progressives and the Constitutionalists and everyone in between and the guy who cut you off this morning in the apartment-sized SUV? Any shrink would tell you: that’s a lot of fury for one country of 312 million to stand. And its message of righteous indignation is very, very loud.

But what about the food? Can there be a connection between the way many of us eat and the fact that it now seems to be our God-given right to check our civility at the door and instead act like knuckle-dragging cavemen? Honestly, I don’t know (and I’m being serious when I say that, so any of you who are planning on putting words in my mouth or massaging the message can stop it right now). All I do know is that for the last fortnight, I haven’t been able to shake off this feeling that maybe it’s time for all of us to live, eat, and feed our friends and families in a more peaceful, civil manner. Maybe food needs to be smaller, slower, and more thoughtful, and served a little less brutishly.

Because the manner in which we eat, I think, will trickle down more generally to the manner in which we live.

1 Jenny January 20, 2011 at 5:17 pm

Thanks for writing this very thought-provoking post. I hadn’t thought to make this connection before, and am pondering. I honestly can’t say whether the manner in which we eat is a cause of anger and isolation, or is merely a symptom of it. Maybe both?

That said, one person’s politeness is another’s rudeness. My husband is South Indian, and traditionally South Indians eat with their hands. This might seem rude to the uninitiated. However, once initiated, one quickly realizes that there is a polite way to eat with one’s hands, and an impolite way! And as I can attest, it’s hard to learn how to do it the right way :o) . So I think it is important to realize that while modes of delivery from plate to mouth might differ, the overarching values of civility and thoughtfulness remain the same. And I do think it’s easy to tell whether or not one is cooking, being served, and eating in a thoughtful and civil manner regardless of which code of table manners one uses.

Thanks again, I really enjoyed reading this!

2 Scotty Harris January 20, 2011 at 5:41 pm

Food for thought. I don’t know about the civility issue though. My choice of eating method is usually based on the food itself, as well as the circumstances of dining. Thus at my cousins absurdly expensive Bat Mitzvah (the rented the Frakking Ontario Science Centre) the lamb chops at the cocktail reception were gnawed out of hand, but the veal chop at dinner was knife and fork.

I must take you to the woodshed over one error. Fonda was in Barbarella, Raquel Welch in 10 million . . . I have watched Shawshank Redemption one too many times.

3 Elissa January 20, 2011 at 5:42 pm

Very well said Jenny, and my mistake for not pointing that out; South Indians, Middle Easterners, Ethiopians—all eat with their hands, usually the right one. As you say, there is definitely a polite way to eat with one’s hands, and an impolite way, and that the overarching values of civility and thoughtfulness remain the same. Thanks again for writing—much appreciated.

4 Elissa January 20, 2011 at 5:43 pm

My goodness! You’re right! Correction coming!

5 Angela FRS January 21, 2011 at 9:43 am

Beautiful post. I couldn’t agree more.

6 Tamar@StarvingofftheLand January 21, 2011 at 10:16 am

I think you’re on to something. Civility, I think, is a kind of restraint, and maybe it’s restraint that we’ve lost all sense of. If we can’t exercise a little discipline in what we eat, what hope is there for civilization? Start with vegetables, maybe you’ll end with world peace.

But don’t be knocking camo snuggies until you’ve spent some time in a sub-freezing duck blind!

7 Erin Block January 21, 2011 at 2:53 pm

Oh! Here, here!!! GREAT post….I think well along the same lines!
http://mysteriesinternal.blogspot.com/2011/01/darkness-comes-early.html

Previous post:

Next post:

indiebound

 

©2009, ©2010, Poor Man's Feast. All rights reserved. To reprint any content herein, including recipes and photography, please contact rights@poormansfeast.com